Originally posted by Happyflame
SMWC doesn't sell anything, but the Attorney General can still just block US users for silly reasons not even included in the bill's provisions.
...It sounds like no one at all even read my post. I specifically stated that stances like this run on the assumption that all lawyers and judges will be absolutely stupid, all lawyers will want to block sites just because they don't like them or just for fun, and all judges will immediately order the sites blocked just on hearing the words "copyright infringement". How do you all know this is true? How do you all know the bill WILL spell doom for the websites we love just for getting passed? How do you all know exactly how every person with power in the US will react? This is the problem I see here: You all fell victim to this video's obvious point: to make you panic for absolutely no reason. Here's a big question for you:
Why do you believe a video on YouTube when such videos have been known to cause panic and mayhem and be UNTRUE?
Just look at "TheRealWeeklyNews". Check out all the "HuluTube" fears they aroused. Did YouTube end up the way they said it WOULD, no matter what? Heck no. It was causing people to panic for no reason, because they believed those videos. Don't believe everything you see on youtube. :|
<Adam> I feel like smwc is a prostitute now, because we put up a porn ad for money